Who Lost GOP Debate? Gas-Taxers

Submitted by MQSullivan on Sat, 01/30/2010 - 10:10am.

Clearly, everyone is convinced their candidate won the Friday night Belo debate of Republican gubernatorial candidates. Sure, whatever. In reality, there was one clear loser: the gas-tax lobby.

The gas-tax lobby is comprised of the editorial boards of the two Metroplex daily papers, local government officials eager for more revenues to waste, and a host of contractors who see a full-funding scheme for their businesses. They lobbied the Legislature aggressively last Session, and lost big.

After the Belo debate, all three candidates have now clearly declared their opposition to raising taxes to pay for more spending. All three have said (in essence) transportation spending needs to be better prioritized, more transparent and more focused.

Whatever any of them considered before, Gov. Rick Perry, Sen. Kay Bailey Hutchison and Debra Medina are on the same page as taxpayers. All know that raising taxes is fully off the table. Transportation policies needs to be radically reformed, diversions ended, transparency imposed and accountability set before new/expanded revenue streams are considered.

What wasn't said, but implied because of the policies underlying the questions, is that this thinking has to go where the gas-taxers haven't wanted anyone to tread: the local entities.

We know about the TxDOT problems because the transparency efforts of 2007. Those must be addressed. But still obscured is the spending done in local governments, because they have rejected calls for budget transparency. (Comptroller Combs has said 94% of Texas local governments refused free help to go transparent.)

The gas-taxers want local government to get to hike what you pay at the pump so they can build monuments to patronage in the form of boondoggles that don't actually move people.

Light-rail is fun at Disney, but it doesn't actually relieve congestion. And commuter-rail might sound romantic if you live in hyper-dense Paris, but doesn't really get people around wide-open Texas in anything like a cost-effective manner.

The problems of congestion and mobility are real. The gas-tax lobby has been pushing solutions that are expensively unreal.

One of the first questions put to Sen. Hutchison was, basically, on gas taxes. The questionner -- Wayne Slater of the aforementioned gas-tax supporting Dallas Morning News -- made the illogical presumption that the only way to deal with transportation woes was with more money. Sen. Hutchison schooled him well enough.

State Sen. John Carona (R-Dallas) and State Rep. Vicki Truitt (R-Southlake) must have particularly felt the sting. They led the charge for reckless policies last Session that all three of their party's candidates have rejected as an option for 2011.

Whichever of the three (Perry, Hutchison or Medina) is sworn in as governor of Texas in January 2011, he or she will have a clear mandate to oppose the gas-tax lobby, and instead pursue real mobility solutions.

Taxpayers won.

"Clearly, everyone is

"Clearly, everyone is convinced their candidate won the Friday night Belo debate of Republican gubernatorial candidates".

We have a straw poll taking place in Tarrant County today:
Tarrant County Conservative Candidate Fair and Straw Poll - Saturday, January 30 at 3:00 PM - 6:00PM (8801 Mid Cities Blvd, North Richland Hills)at Legacy Church of Christ. Voting follows.

"Whichever of the three" ( Medina, Perry or Hutchinson ) "is sworn in as governor of Texas in January 2011, he or she will have a clear mandate to oppose the gas-tax lobby, and instead pursue real mobility solutions".

Sullivan, do you have a plan for "real mobility solutions"? Honestly , I'm just asking your input.

YES! There are a couple

YES! There are a couple great ways to attack the congestion/mobility problem.

First, transparency. We need to see where every dollar is spent; not just state spending, but how locals are spending those transportation-related dollars.

Second, end diversions. Right now, more than 40% of every gas-tax dollar is spent on something other than road and bridge construction/maintenance. Beyond that, even more dollars are spent on things that don't construct lane miles. (For example, the millions spent installing free wifi at rest stops.)

Third, prioritization. Believe it or not, there is no requirement that spending projects actually be ordered on the basis of how much congestion relieved or mobility improved. That's why billions can flow into things like light-rail, which simply cannot, has not, and even by the admission of supporters will not, ever relieve congestion.

Fourth, accountability. Every dollar has be tracked.

Fifth, spend dollars on the most relieving solutions. Some estimates show the current 100 most congested places in Texas could be solved with existing dollars if we just did those things that reduce congestion. Sometimes it is extra lane miles, sometimes it's a bypass, sometimes its a fly-over, HOV lanes, whatever.

Our problem in transportation isn't a lack of revenues. Each year, more gas-tax revenues have flowed into the state's coffers than the previous year -- even surpassing inflation. At the local level, cities and counties have been using their taxing capacity for fluffy things (football stadiums) and not needed things (roads).

The problem is spending, not the revenues.

We need to get the spending right LONG before we talk about revenue streams.

I am just curious why Rick

I am just curious why Rick Perry isn't doing something now about the gas tax like he said in the debate? Seems he is all talk but no action.

It is not fair to lay the

It is not fair to lay the blame of this at the Gov's feet. The Legislature should have addressed these issues during the session.